Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and be paid till of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal staff members as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with an unclear guarantee that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s an extremely misleading term to use in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there’s typically some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: employment First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no guarantees included in this email. The only thing I can tell you for certain is that if you change your mind, the company’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically offering up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have major repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a good deal for individuals who do not wish to return to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and employment this administration is extremely generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, employment that it’s designed to get folks who work actually difficult to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are people who enjoy their task. They love the objective of the company. They work hard. And right now, they’re facing really hard options, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m unsure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much potentially setting the stage for obstacles since I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site regards to use and consents pages at www.npr.org for more information.

NPR records are created on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not remain in its final form and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.