
Le K
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date July 2, 2006
-
Sectors Mushroom production
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 5
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence company that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies reactions similar to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these two nations to establish advanced AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established competitors has been explained as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is emerging as a worldwide AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be freely available for use, adjustment, viewing, and designing documents for building functions. [13] The company supposedly strongly hires young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is freely readily available for use, adjustment, and viewing. This includes consent to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to design documents, for constructing purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence lab dedicated to research study developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were reluctant in providing financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to produce an exit in a short amount of time. [15]
After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being called the catalyst for China’s AI design rate war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI designs to complete with the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no detailed strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its innovation to avoid the most strict arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to comply with the government’s controls on info. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities rather than work experience, resulting in the majority of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people without any computer system science background to help its technology understand other topics and knowledge areas, including being able to generate poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered totally free to both scientists and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and responsible downstream use” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was developed to complete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the very same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the two Base designs was likewise launched concurrently, gotten by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed specialists” that may not be. They found this to assist with professional balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become extremely depended on, while other experts may be seldom used, squandering parameters. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are similarly used then triggers specialists to duplicate the very same capacity. They proposed the shared professionals to find out core capacities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capacities that are seldom used. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward model was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was continuously updated throughout training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The first stage was trained to solve mathematics and coding problems. This stage used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second stage was trained to be handy, safe, and follow rules. This phase utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human choice information. The rule-based reward design was manually set. All qualified benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They selected 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they found that RL on thinking data had “unique attributes” various from RL on general data. For instance, RL on thinking might improve over more training steps. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller, and trained likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “further research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then integrated with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was produced by a benefit design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It contained a higher ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning data was created by “skilled models”. Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “professional models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and confirm during thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each professional design was trained to produce just artificial thinking data in one specific domain (math, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information including both last benefit and chain-of-thought leading to the final reward. The benefit design produced reward signals for both concerns with unbiased however free-form answers, and questions without objective answers (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for programs issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team carried out extensive low-level engineering to achieve performance. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to collect properly. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They reduced communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact maker each expert was on in order to avoid certain devices being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible via DeepSeek’s API, along with by means of a chat interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data produced by R1. [47]
A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks of the thinking procedure in the mind and then supplies the user with the response. The thinking process and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here answer here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, “mainly” of two types (other types were not defined): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed answer is right (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has issues with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these concerns and additional improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong final response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses concerns, resolves reasoning issues and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have required only about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested constructing its most current AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive performance at fairly very little cost has actually been recognized as possibly challenging the international dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current models when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to offer viewpoints and ideas on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has highlighted possible limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export constraints on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models as a result “sparked market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major global innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the main application shows interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers found in China, utilizes censorship systems for topics that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For example, the design refuses to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially create a response, however then erases it soon afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be eliminated to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and mentioned: “We securely oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are devoted to achieving the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering certain answers to a few of these topics by requesting in its answer to switch specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some experts fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms state “We save the details we gather in secure servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you supply to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian information security authority is looking for additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual info. [83]
Expert system industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outshines Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model appears to be among the finest ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We ought to take the developments out of China extremely, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily limited brand-new sign-ups, citing ‘massive malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, information privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for information from DeepSeek on information protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines result of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.